When it comes to data analysis I’d be the first to admit I’m a bit of a neophyte. Squiggly stuff like equations - love it. Real numbers - a bit yukky. But I occasionally get the urge to confuse myself and play with hard ‘data’, particularly when it comes to covid.
Sounds like when we had a 30%-somthing increase in chainsaw-accidents from one year to the next.
It led to chainsaws now requiring a license to operate (there are twelve such licenses, total cost to get all of them is about £3 000) since media gotthe politicos to panic.
That we had had a whopper of a storm the previous year, leading to lots more small forest-owners being out and about working in dangerous circumstances, storm-felled trees being ridiculouslydangerous, didn't register.
And now our forest industry have trouble finding employees. Gee. All numbers approximations:
Driver's license, regular one for manual and auto: £3 500 - £5 000 on average, all costs included.
License for heavy vehicles (18-wheelers): £2 000
License for harvester: £ 2 000
License for chainsaw, basic: £ 1000
I'll stop there, by asking: what 18-yearod would invest that much to the go into forrestry work which is seasonal anyway?
And "the market forces" were initially the driving force behind the licenses, to keep competiton out. Before the EU, you were trained on the job and got sacked if "youse wuz an eedjit".
"The number of deaths was above the five-year average in private homes (28.7% above, 732 excess deaths), hospitals (20.4% above, 869 excess deaths), care homes (14.8% above, 298 excess deaths) and other settings (14.3% above, 106 excess deaths)."
"The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 31 March 2023 (Week 13) was 13,137, which was 19.6% above the five-year average (2,156 more deaths)"
This statement at the beginning:
"In the week ending 31 March 2023 (Week 13), 11,584 deaths were registered in England and Wales;"
So looks like Scotland and Northern Ireland a higher percentage yet again based on them having between them about 10% of the population.
Considering the Winter 'flu season has gone why are the excess deaths still so persistently high and that is with the new revised upwards 5 year average death numbers which is now "The term excess deaths in this statistical bulletin refers to the number of deaths above the five-year average. For 2020 and 2021, the average for 2015 to 2019 has been used. For 2022, the average is calculated from 2016 to 2019 and 2021 data. For 2023, the average is calculated from 2017 to 2019, 2021, and 2022 data. This provides a comparison of the number of deaths expected in a usual (non-coronavirus pandemic) year.".
Anyone guess at a cause considering almost zero autopsies are being done that include looking for a possible link to the jibbyjabbies or whether they had no part of the death and we are all nutters.
Apr 14, 2023·edited Apr 14, 2023Liked by Rudolph Rigger
Or......the virus does not exist....or if I ignore all the growing evidence that viruses are a gigantic fiction and no one has EVER proven they can be transmitted and cause an infection/ illness.....but let's say I ignore that.....then it looks like what ever normally kills people, added to the horrendous medical emergency practices, and dreadful lack of care overall by the emergency style NHS, the mistaken and fatal use of respirators, and the granny killing drugs.....then really nothing extra happened except the actual reaction to the fake Covid Plandemic ( Planned months earlier as witnessed for all to see who bothered to watch the Event 201 organised by Bill and Melinda with the Johns Hopkins University.) It's only going to get worse I think as the clot shot does its evil more prolonged job.
I think it’s clear that the rise in death rates in 2017 and 2018 was caused by the election of Donald Trump. (For those who don’t understand this I am hoping to get some new income from somewhere within the MSM. And I would like to hook up with a rich widowed soccer grandmom.)
Sounds like when we had a 30%-somthing increase in chainsaw-accidents from one year to the next.
It led to chainsaws now requiring a license to operate (there are twelve such licenses, total cost to get all of them is about £3 000) since media gotthe politicos to panic.
That we had had a whopper of a storm the previous year, leading to lots more small forest-owners being out and about working in dangerous circumstances, storm-felled trees being ridiculouslydangerous, didn't register.
And now our forest industry have trouble finding employees. Gee. All numbers approximations:
Driver's license, regular one for manual and auto: £3 500 - £5 000 on average, all costs included.
License for heavy vehicles (18-wheelers): £2 000
License for harvester: £ 2 000
License for chainsaw, basic: £ 1000
I'll stop there, by asking: what 18-yearod would invest that much to the go into forrestry work which is seasonal anyway?
And "the market forces" were initially the driving force behind the licenses, to keep competiton out. Before the EU, you were trained on the job and got sacked if "youse wuz an eedjit".
From this week's ONS figures total deaths down which they seem to boast about:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending31march2023
But look at the excess numbers:
"The number of deaths was above the five-year average in private homes (28.7% above, 732 excess deaths), hospitals (20.4% above, 869 excess deaths), care homes (14.8% above, 298 excess deaths) and other settings (14.3% above, 106 excess deaths)."
"The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 31 March 2023 (Week 13) was 13,137, which was 19.6% above the five-year average (2,156 more deaths)"
This statement at the beginning:
"In the week ending 31 March 2023 (Week 13), 11,584 deaths were registered in England and Wales;"
So looks like Scotland and Northern Ireland a higher percentage yet again based on them having between them about 10% of the population.
Considering the Winter 'flu season has gone why are the excess deaths still so persistently high and that is with the new revised upwards 5 year average death numbers which is now "The term excess deaths in this statistical bulletin refers to the number of deaths above the five-year average. For 2020 and 2021, the average for 2015 to 2019 has been used. For 2022, the average is calculated from 2016 to 2019 and 2021 data. For 2023, the average is calculated from 2017 to 2019, 2021, and 2022 data. This provides a comparison of the number of deaths expected in a usual (non-coronavirus pandemic) year.".
Anyone guess at a cause considering almost zero autopsies are being done that include looking for a possible link to the jibbyjabbies or whether they had no part of the death and we are all nutters.
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/latest-release
The 2022 monthly mortality data looks even worse to me but I am on my tiny screen and a little squinty.
Or......the virus does not exist....or if I ignore all the growing evidence that viruses are a gigantic fiction and no one has EVER proven they can be transmitted and cause an infection/ illness.....but let's say I ignore that.....then it looks like what ever normally kills people, added to the horrendous medical emergency practices, and dreadful lack of care overall by the emergency style NHS, the mistaken and fatal use of respirators, and the granny killing drugs.....then really nothing extra happened except the actual reaction to the fake Covid Plandemic ( Planned months earlier as witnessed for all to see who bothered to watch the Event 201 organised by Bill and Melinda with the Johns Hopkins University.) It's only going to get worse I think as the clot shot does its evil more prolonged job.
I think it’s clear that the rise in death rates in 2017 and 2018 was caused by the election of Donald Trump. (For those who don’t understand this I am hoping to get some new income from somewhere within the MSM. And I would like to hook up with a rich widowed soccer grandmom.)
Another convincing argument against injecting or ingesting pharma-chemical concoctions.