When I was in the army, the Psalm always went "Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, because I'm the meanest mother fucker in the valley".
It's the best way to be, when one is in the Valley of the Shadow.
I have also experienced the scales falling from my eyes in a number of areas as you have described. My views on climate change have gone from being mostly on board but a touch sceptical in 2019, to now thinking it's all complete bullshit, and that's solely because of the blatant similarity between the Covid and climate narratives. I'm also now far more cautious in my views about other vaccines specifically, and big-pharma medications in general. If they can fuck the covid Vax up so badly, what else have they made a hash of?
In general, it's safest to think along the following lines...
If Bill Gates is involved with something, avoid it.
If the PM says it's true, it's false.
If a government agency says its safe, its dangerous.
If Parliament makes a law to "help you", it will eventually hurt you.
If the mainstream media agree on something, it's a lie.
President Ronald Reagan knew this was true thirty-seven years ago when he said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
Y’know, I probably wouldn’t have ever questioned the phrase “zero emissions” if they hadn’t tried playing the same game with Covid. In other news, my son— a product of his time in some ways— mentioned laughingly but not mockingly the other day that cow farts are ruining the planet. “Stop right there,” I said. “I need you to explain to me exactly how that works in the context of the size of our planet, global number of cattle, and comparative flatulence by species. Moreover, given the urgency of this matter, I would like an essay on the methane gas emissions of giant pandas, a species humans go to bizarre lengths to preserve and reproduce that doesn’t (as far as I know) provide an efficient source of nutrition and clothing.” (Poor kid. He was just trying to make a fart joke, and I’m trying to turn him into the based boy version of Matilda.)
Applause from me, kids will repeat anything. The sooner he learns that half of what he hears is complete crap, the better. In public school, 75% of the 'facts' are crap by my estimation, and I have been out of school for 35 years. After all, they aren't there to learn how to think, but rather to learn how not to think about certain things.
Ohh that’s wonderful. But don’t feel bad about your response because my son has just been offered a job and is wanting to delay his start date. Why? Because he’d quite like to go travelling. I’m sure, so would I, but I’m too busy working to support him in London. So I responded, “I don’t think so. You’re the one who studied a masters in ESG. But you’re quite happy to ignore all those carbon emissions you’d be producing by flying hither, thither and yon?? So think of the polar bears, love”. To his credit, he said , “ fair point mum”.
I had an interaction with a science-denier the other day, on a different stack. This person started by alluding to a vague background in science (biology, nothing more specific than that) and wrote a long piece that was the usual talking-points rehashed.
Being an annoying git when I want to, I pointed out three recent (climate and geologicall speaking) eras when the local climate was warmer, and asked this person why and how this could have happened.
The questions are fully answerable, because the facts about them are old and well-known:
"Why could my ancestors grow grapes at 55 North 3 000 years ago?
Why was it several degrees Celsius warmer as a yearly average during the viking era?
Why was the european average mean temperature more than 2 degrees Celsius higher when Octavian was emperor of Rome?"
All three statements are correct enough for a debate, but no answer was forthcoming, only the repetition of the talking-points in a different configuration.
I also posited a bonus-question, which I believe should be possible to answer in full if climate science is actually a field of science:
"And here's a bonus-question: exactly how and in which way(s) have over 2 000 nuclear weapons detonating during 70 years affected the climate?"
This one should be easy, if the science is settled. The yield of each warhead is known. The blast-sites and data about the test are largely de-classified. Therefore, it should be no problem to feed these data into or remove them from the formulae used to determine whehter the climate is warming, and whether it's is manmade (or to which degree it is if so). I hardly think we can get a better ceterus paribus-type of comparison than that.
Yet only the talking points were repeated.
So either this is one out of the hordes of believers without facts (a cultist to be precise), or there's no data and no studies to find that has looked into this (pretty sure there are), or the questions cannot be answered using climate science.
None of which are very satisfying conclusions, scientifically speaking, since it only leaves global scale fraud from corporations and governements against the people of Earth as the remains once the razor has done it's work.
Not to mention, for someone actually well-versed in the facts my questions would have been trivial to answer*, which leads me to my conclusion: it is a cult, a Doomsday cult, and it's legions of acolytes only repeat dogma.
PS: Asking a question, where the question itself contains errors, is an old teacher's trick to see if the student has real knowledge or is just answering questions by rote. It's also a useful rethorical device. In swedish, we call those "slamkrypare" which literally means "sludgecrawlers", as in you miss them unless you're willing to get dirty by actually looking for them.
Sludgecrawlers - awesome, love it. I've used a fair few of those during my time teaching 😂
I've only just started looking into the 'climate' a bit more actively and already the question list is piling up - just like it did when I started looking into covid.
I haven't seen the actual math details of the 'climate' models yet, but I suspect they're a good deal more complicated than the covid models used in an attempt to terrify us. Oceans, winds, water vapour, clouds, radiative heating and cooling, earth tilt, precessions and wobbles, sun activity, climate zones, land cover, and so on - an awful lot of things interacting in complicated ways.
Then there's the 'minor' issue of doing this for an entire planet - along with the equally minor issue of the details of the actual computation which must be using a fairly substantial grid size.
The surface area of the earth (land and sea) is around 500 million square km - that's just a 2-dimensional 'slice' - and it has to be treated as a 3D problem. There's no way you're going to get a fine enough resolution here and still be able to actually run the computation.
You might be able to make some intelligent statements about statistical *trends* - maybe, dunno - but I'd be questioning any model that claims to make accurate predictions.
Good comment but one needn’t go back 3,000 years. Grapes were grown North of 55 during the Medieval Warm Period. But who is educating the public while teachers are miseducating students and the MSM knows nothing?
As a former teacher, that my colleagues as a majority (here in Sweden) has turned into nothing more than enthusiastic Unterscharführerinnen for whatever is decreed the New True is painful to watch.
A book on natural sciences (age 10-12) used at a schoolwere I worked had one spread in black and white, showing coal plants, oil rigs, and nuclear plants with dead fish floating in a river and bird skeletons on the ground. The next spread was in full colour showing solar panels on a small cottage, a windmill connected to a generator connected to a car, and a small dam in the little stream next to the cottage. Happy people, birds and smallanimals and flowers everywhere.
Not a single fact, not a single point of data, just programming.
With the greatest respect, BBB was absurd for other reasons.
1. The people who used that expression have never built anything, except piles of manure and hatred.
2. They maliciously and irrationally maligned a very good builder, who was also a very good POTUS who promoted policies that created economic growth and peace.
Perhaps they are aware that when it comes to the erection of skyscrapers in America, Native Americans are overrepresented. By logic of the BBB morons therefore these skyscrapers must be levelled.
Yes - I probably should have qualified things by saying "at least" 2 things odd about BBB.
I did find it very, very odd that this execrable phrase was being used worldwide so quickly after the outbreak.
It was like they'd all been given the same script - that somehow, for some reason, a moderately serious viral infection necessitated major, major changes to the way we'd been doing things. It was deeply bizarre - and made no sense (unless there was some other agenda to use the 'opportunity' presented by Covid - something The Grand OverDick of WEF himself explicitly stated several times).
Am I the only one wondering what the orange thing is in the water? Is it a goldfish? Do they have bad memories? "the memory of a, you know the err, the thing, . . . orange, lives in water."
😄 I love it, mouse boost!
I went from going along with climate change even though I knew I didn't understand the science, to actively being ready to say it's way complex, we don't know if they're collecting the data accurately and there are scientists who don't agree. Let's hear them out. I'm glad people are waking up to other parts of the fear and control agenda.
I read your title and was pleasantly surprised. I don't quote the Bible, I don't know much about it, but something happened last week where I took comfort in that psalm, and repeated it to myself over a few days. 🙏❤️💪🏽
I’ve spent the better part of the last three years trying to figure out how/why so many fairly intelligent people could be so easily and completely snookered into believing this con without even a modicum of unease, distrust, questioning. People I formerly respected as knowledgeable, critical thinkers happily jumped onto the Jab Train without any hesitation! WTF is going on?
I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that it’s a genetic response. Their Fight-or-Flight reactions are 100% Flight. I saw this many times in my career as a law enforcement officer. Even amongst us there were differing responses. Most of us immediately ran toward a violent and potentially deadly situation. Many hesitated and then responded when they felt safer. (After there were already several of us ahead of them that may have already diffused the situation). And others, never responded at all. Check out the stories of the school shootings in Parkland, Florida and Uvalde, Texas where officers on scene did not enter the buildings where children were being shot.
COVID fear was stoked so fast and so deeply (We are ALL going to die without jabs!) that those folks who have a weak fight-or-flight reaction simply couldn’t take the cortisol/adrenaline rush and would have chopped off their right hands to have it over. So they injected themselves willingly and happily to make the “scary” go away. Which didn’t happen so they continue to nicer themselves and hasten their deaths. Sad.
There was definitely something off about everything - and the response of people once thought of as being 'critical' thinkers was definitely one of the things that was odd. Even now you can find clever people, very accomplished in their fields of expertise, making statements about covid and health which are, essentially, crazy.
My son is quite brilliant. Attended Georgetown University on a full four-year ride and then in to graduate work. He’s got double masters degrees. And was always very much a “thinker”. Very logical, very much a “show me the proof” guy. He did cancer research while in university and wrote amazing thesis papers. He works now in science and technology at a fairly high level. Then COVID comes along and he collapses immediately and fully into the “OMG we are all going to die if we don’t stay home, mask up and force people to take unproven medical interventions”. Three years in and he and his wife have still not dined in a restaurant or gone anywhere indoors without being masked!
I’m simply gobsmacked by his level of irrational fear.
Most surprising to me is that I’m a natural risk taker and adventure seeker. When he was still living at home I took him on amazing and sometimes risky vacations and adventures. He loved it and I wanted to grow a confident man. The change in him is so disheartening as I had thought I raised a resilient and bold man. But it seems his fearlessness has got up and gone.
The chap who founded the company I used to work for has a genius level intellect. He has an inhuman ability to quickly absorb facts, synthesise new concepts, perform complex calculations instantly in his head, invent amazing devices...the whole 9 yards. But he fell hook line and sinker for the covid baloney. He was going to mandate vaccines for all staff until me and a few others advised him that we were employees, not slaves, and now I no longer work there.
His blindness and gullibility was astonishing. A man who throighout his professional career insisted on the most rigorous and detailed testing of his products prior to delivery was willing to inject an essentially untested product into his body, repeatedly, and force his employees to do the same. It was surreal. And it didn't work because he caught the bug a few weeks ago, and suffered a few days of mild discomfort. :insert eyeroll emoji here:
The great genius, Theoretical Physicist Rudolf Rigger, explained it perfectly on this site in Thank God For The Time Lords. We are experiencing a PANICDEMIC and unfortunately those in the western world who have not panicked are only about 10% of the population. I think it does not bode well for mankind, but perhaps it has always been ever thus, or even worse. The answer is beyond my ken.
I have had the great, good fortune to have interacted and worked with some truly brilliant people over my career - including a couple of Nobel prize winners (interacted with rather than worked with).
It's profoundly shocking to meet someone **that** intelligent - they almost seem to be another species. I felt like a Salieri - I had just enough talent to recognise true genius.
I've written a number of papers with a friend of mine who is seriously, seriously smart. He rarely used paper and did all the calculations in his head - including solving complex partial differential equations. Most of the rest of us scribbled away just trying to keep up with him. And even he felt humbled by some of the people he worked and interacted with.
I think it’s been this way for years but the COVID hysteria just brought it all way into the forefront. Before we could mostly ignore the obvious feminization of men over the last 2-3 decades. A nation of fearful and weak men unfortunately fuels a nation of fearful and
weak women. And the feminazis who all worked for equality did so by emasculating men. They didn’t elevate themselves to be stronger. They just destroyed all the men they could to make themselves feel better. And we’re now mostly a world full of weak, fearful, complacent people. Those who buck the systems, like most of us reading this Stack, are now the demons. They’re coming after us. Be watchful.
When I was in the army, the Psalm always went "Yea though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, because I'm the meanest mother fucker in the valley".
It's the best way to be, when one is in the Valley of the Shadow.
I have also experienced the scales falling from my eyes in a number of areas as you have described. My views on climate change have gone from being mostly on board but a touch sceptical in 2019, to now thinking it's all complete bullshit, and that's solely because of the blatant similarity between the Covid and climate narratives. I'm also now far more cautious in my views about other vaccines specifically, and big-pharma medications in general. If they can fuck the covid Vax up so badly, what else have they made a hash of?
In general, it's safest to think along the following lines...
If Bill Gates is involved with something, avoid it.
If the PM says it's true, it's false.
If a government agency says its safe, its dangerous.
If Parliament makes a law to "help you", it will eventually hurt you.
If the mainstream media agree on something, it's a lie.
Etc....
I always used to think I was a bit 'savvy', having a 'realistically' cynical view of governments and media.
I realise, now, that the actual word I was looking for was "naïve" 😂
Hard lessons learned.
Now you know what you need to know.
Yer alright. :)
You too. :)
President Ronald Reagan knew this was true thirty-seven years ago when he said, “The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
Yes: just look for the 'contra-indicators' and everything falls into place...
Y’know, I probably wouldn’t have ever questioned the phrase “zero emissions” if they hadn’t tried playing the same game with Covid. In other news, my son— a product of his time in some ways— mentioned laughingly but not mockingly the other day that cow farts are ruining the planet. “Stop right there,” I said. “I need you to explain to me exactly how that works in the context of the size of our planet, global number of cattle, and comparative flatulence by species. Moreover, given the urgency of this matter, I would like an essay on the methane gas emissions of giant pandas, a species humans go to bizarre lengths to preserve and reproduce that doesn’t (as far as I know) provide an efficient source of nutrition and clothing.” (Poor kid. He was just trying to make a fart joke, and I’m trying to turn him into the based boy version of Matilda.)
Applause from me, kids will repeat anything. The sooner he learns that half of what he hears is complete crap, the better. In public school, 75% of the 'facts' are crap by my estimation, and I have been out of school for 35 years. After all, they aren't there to learn how to think, but rather to learn how not to think about certain things.
Ohh that’s wonderful. But don’t feel bad about your response because my son has just been offered a job and is wanting to delay his start date. Why? Because he’d quite like to go travelling. I’m sure, so would I, but I’m too busy working to support him in London. So I responded, “I don’t think so. You’re the one who studied a masters in ESG. But you’re quite happy to ignore all those carbon emissions you’d be producing by flying hither, thither and yon?? So think of the polar bears, love”. To his credit, he said , “ fair point mum”.
I had an interaction with a science-denier the other day, on a different stack. This person started by alluding to a vague background in science (biology, nothing more specific than that) and wrote a long piece that was the usual talking-points rehashed.
Being an annoying git when I want to, I pointed out three recent (climate and geologicall speaking) eras when the local climate was warmer, and asked this person why and how this could have happened.
The questions are fully answerable, because the facts about them are old and well-known:
"Why could my ancestors grow grapes at 55 North 3 000 years ago?
Why was it several degrees Celsius warmer as a yearly average during the viking era?
Why was the european average mean temperature more than 2 degrees Celsius higher when Octavian was emperor of Rome?"
All three statements are correct enough for a debate, but no answer was forthcoming, only the repetition of the talking-points in a different configuration.
I also posited a bonus-question, which I believe should be possible to answer in full if climate science is actually a field of science:
"And here's a bonus-question: exactly how and in which way(s) have over 2 000 nuclear weapons detonating during 70 years affected the climate?"
This one should be easy, if the science is settled. The yield of each warhead is known. The blast-sites and data about the test are largely de-classified. Therefore, it should be no problem to feed these data into or remove them from the formulae used to determine whehter the climate is warming, and whether it's is manmade (or to which degree it is if so). I hardly think we can get a better ceterus paribus-type of comparison than that.
Yet only the talking points were repeated.
So either this is one out of the hordes of believers without facts (a cultist to be precise), or there's no data and no studies to find that has looked into this (pretty sure there are), or the questions cannot be answered using climate science.
None of which are very satisfying conclusions, scientifically speaking, since it only leaves global scale fraud from corporations and governements against the people of Earth as the remains once the razor has done it's work.
Not to mention, for someone actually well-versed in the facts my questions would have been trivial to answer*, which leads me to my conclusion: it is a cult, a Doomsday cult, and it's legions of acolytes only repeat dogma.
PS: Asking a question, where the question itself contains errors, is an old teacher's trick to see if the student has real knowledge or is just answering questions by rote. It's also a useful rethorical device. In swedish, we call those "slamkrypare" which literally means "sludgecrawlers", as in you miss them unless you're willing to get dirty by actually looking for them.
Sludgecrawlers - awesome, love it. I've used a fair few of those during my time teaching 😂
I've only just started looking into the 'climate' a bit more actively and already the question list is piling up - just like it did when I started looking into covid.
I haven't seen the actual math details of the 'climate' models yet, but I suspect they're a good deal more complicated than the covid models used in an attempt to terrify us. Oceans, winds, water vapour, clouds, radiative heating and cooling, earth tilt, precessions and wobbles, sun activity, climate zones, land cover, and so on - an awful lot of things interacting in complicated ways.
Then there's the 'minor' issue of doing this for an entire planet - along with the equally minor issue of the details of the actual computation which must be using a fairly substantial grid size.
The surface area of the earth (land and sea) is around 500 million square km - that's just a 2-dimensional 'slice' - and it has to be treated as a 3D problem. There's no way you're going to get a fine enough resolution here and still be able to actually run the computation.
You might be able to make some intelligent statements about statistical *trends* - maybe, dunno - but I'd be questioning any model that claims to make accurate predictions.
Good comment but one needn’t go back 3,000 years. Grapes were grown North of 55 during the Medieval Warm Period. But who is educating the public while teachers are miseducating students and the MSM knows nothing?
https://notrickszone.com/2018/04/02/during-the-800s-1300s-ad-wine-grapes-were-grown-at-latitudes-where-polar-bears-now-roam/
As a former teacher, that my colleagues as a majority (here in Sweden) has turned into nothing more than enthusiastic Unterscharführerinnen for whatever is decreed the New True is painful to watch.
A book on natural sciences (age 10-12) used at a schoolwere I worked had one spread in black and white, showing coal plants, oil rigs, and nuclear plants with dead fish floating in a river and bird skeletons on the ground. The next spread was in full colour showing solar panels on a small cottage, a windmill connected to a generator connected to a car, and a small dam in the little stream next to the cottage. Happy people, birds and smallanimals and flowers everywhere.
Not a single fact, not a single point of data, just programming.
RR (the new Roy Rogers)
With the greatest respect, BBB was absurd for other reasons.
1. The people who used that expression have never built anything, except piles of manure and hatred.
2. They maliciously and irrationally maligned a very good builder, who was also a very good POTUS who promoted policies that created economic growth and peace.
Perhaps they are aware that when it comes to the erection of skyscrapers in America, Native Americans are overrepresented. By logic of the BBB morons therefore these skyscrapers must be levelled.
Yes - I probably should have qualified things by saying "at least" 2 things odd about BBB.
I did find it very, very odd that this execrable phrase was being used worldwide so quickly after the outbreak.
It was like they'd all been given the same script - that somehow, for some reason, a moderately serious viral infection necessitated major, major changes to the way we'd been doing things. It was deeply bizarre - and made no sense (unless there was some other agenda to use the 'opportunity' presented by Covid - something The Grand OverDick of WEF himself explicitly stated several times).
Am I the only one wondering what the orange thing is in the water? Is it a goldfish? Do they have bad memories? "the memory of a, you know the err, the thing, . . . orange, lives in water."
😄 I love it, mouse boost!
I went from going along with climate change even though I knew I didn't understand the science, to actively being ready to say it's way complex, we don't know if they're collecting the data accurately and there are scientists who don't agree. Let's hear them out. I'm glad people are waking up to other parts of the fear and control agenda.
I read your title and was pleasantly surprised. I don't quote the Bible, I don't know much about it, but something happened last week where I took comfort in that psalm, and repeated it to myself over a few days. 🙏❤️💪🏽
It comes from phrases like
"he has the memory of a goldfish"
or, more usually, "the attention span of a goldfish"
I had assumed this was a well-known expression - but maybe not
You might like CJ Hopkins: https://cjhopkins.substack.com/p/the-mother-of-all-limited-hangouts
yes - his stack is great - I love his writing 👍
I’ve spent the better part of the last three years trying to figure out how/why so many fairly intelligent people could be so easily and completely snookered into believing this con without even a modicum of unease, distrust, questioning. People I formerly respected as knowledgeable, critical thinkers happily jumped onto the Jab Train without any hesitation! WTF is going on?
I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that it’s a genetic response. Their Fight-or-Flight reactions are 100% Flight. I saw this many times in my career as a law enforcement officer. Even amongst us there were differing responses. Most of us immediately ran toward a violent and potentially deadly situation. Many hesitated and then responded when they felt safer. (After there were already several of us ahead of them that may have already diffused the situation). And others, never responded at all. Check out the stories of the school shootings in Parkland, Florida and Uvalde, Texas where officers on scene did not enter the buildings where children were being shot.
COVID fear was stoked so fast and so deeply (We are ALL going to die without jabs!) that those folks who have a weak fight-or-flight reaction simply couldn’t take the cortisol/adrenaline rush and would have chopped off their right hands to have it over. So they injected themselves willingly and happily to make the “scary” go away. Which didn’t happen so they continue to nicer themselves and hasten their deaths. Sad.
Interesting thought Cindy
There was definitely something off about everything - and the response of people once thought of as being 'critical' thinkers was definitely one of the things that was odd. Even now you can find clever people, very accomplished in their fields of expertise, making statements about covid and health which are, essentially, crazy.
Exactly, Rudolph,
My son is quite brilliant. Attended Georgetown University on a full four-year ride and then in to graduate work. He’s got double masters degrees. And was always very much a “thinker”. Very logical, very much a “show me the proof” guy. He did cancer research while in university and wrote amazing thesis papers. He works now in science and technology at a fairly high level. Then COVID comes along and he collapses immediately and fully into the “OMG we are all going to die if we don’t stay home, mask up and force people to take unproven medical interventions”. Three years in and he and his wife have still not dined in a restaurant or gone anywhere indoors without being masked!
I’m simply gobsmacked by his level of irrational fear.
Most surprising to me is that I’m a natural risk taker and adventure seeker. When he was still living at home I took him on amazing and sometimes risky vacations and adventures. He loved it and I wanted to grow a confident man. The change in him is so disheartening as I had thought I raised a resilient and bold man. But it seems his fearlessness has got up and gone.
The chap who founded the company I used to work for has a genius level intellect. He has an inhuman ability to quickly absorb facts, synthesise new concepts, perform complex calculations instantly in his head, invent amazing devices...the whole 9 yards. But he fell hook line and sinker for the covid baloney. He was going to mandate vaccines for all staff until me and a few others advised him that we were employees, not slaves, and now I no longer work there.
His blindness and gullibility was astonishing. A man who throighout his professional career insisted on the most rigorous and detailed testing of his products prior to delivery was willing to inject an essentially untested product into his body, repeatedly, and force his employees to do the same. It was surreal. And it didn't work because he caught the bug a few weeks ago, and suffered a few days of mild discomfort. :insert eyeroll emoji here:
CindyArizona
The great genius, Theoretical Physicist Rudolf Rigger, explained it perfectly on this site in Thank God For The Time Lords. We are experiencing a PANICDEMIC and unfortunately those in the western world who have not panicked are only about 10% of the population. I think it does not bode well for mankind, but perhaps it has always been ever thus, or even worse. The answer is beyond my ken.
Genius? 😂
I hope you were being sarcastic there!
I have had the great, good fortune to have interacted and worked with some truly brilliant people over my career - including a couple of Nobel prize winners (interacted with rather than worked with).
It's profoundly shocking to meet someone **that** intelligent - they almost seem to be another species. I felt like a Salieri - I had just enough talent to recognise true genius.
I've written a number of papers with a friend of mine who is seriously, seriously smart. He rarely used paper and did all the calculations in his head - including solving complex partial differential equations. Most of the rest of us scribbled away just trying to keep up with him. And even he felt humbled by some of the people he worked and interacted with.
I think it’s been this way for years but the COVID hysteria just brought it all way into the forefront. Before we could mostly ignore the obvious feminization of men over the last 2-3 decades. A nation of fearful and weak men unfortunately fuels a nation of fearful and
weak women. And the feminazis who all worked for equality did so by emasculating men. They didn’t elevate themselves to be stronger. They just destroyed all the men they could to make themselves feel better. And we’re now mostly a world full of weak, fearful, complacent people. Those who buck the systems, like most of us reading this Stack, are now the demons. They’re coming after us. Be watchful.
Since you've written about models and algorithms maybe this is right up your alley?
[https://notthebee.com/article/marines-wearing-cardboard-boxes-easily-defeat-pentagons-new-ai-system]
Bodes well for algortihms driving cars this does not.
Oops, sorry about the “nicer”/inject typo. We need an “edit” button.