Discussion about this post

User's avatar
CindyArizona's avatar

The only reason I see for Trump to slow down would be because I don’t want him to tire himself out too early in the game! We voted for exactly what he and his team are doing. Blow the whole motherfucker up and start over. Much smaller. Much tighter. Much more transparent. The folks screeching loudest have puckered assholes knowing their 30years of graft are gone. And with Pam Bondi as our new AG they’re scared shitless. What Elon and his crew of merry men have unearthed is just the teeniest tip of a gargantuan iceberg. It’s a beautiful thing to watch and I’m glad to be able to see it in my lifetime. Pop more popcorn…this is going to be a fun four years.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

"Trump will need to calm down a bit eventually and return to a more ‘consensual’ style of operation."

Why? Honestly asking, mind. The only reason I'd see to slow down or return to normal in his position, would be that the job of cleaning up was done and dusted.

And even if so, I'd fire up all the stuff that's needed doing for decades but no-one's bothered with due to all sorts of stupid non-reasons.

"Economic cognoscenti will doubtless tell me that ‘analogy’ is hopelessly naïve and misguided and that “it doesn’t work like that”'

Been a while and half since I studied national economy as we call the subject over here, but that is exactly how it works. All the state's little black holes of spending adds up to an ever-growing deficit, unless you institute a "Kartoffel-kur": the Danes did this in the 1970s, due to their economy being busted thanks to political mismanagement - Kartoffel means potatoe, so it refers to being so poor you only have potatoes to eat, while saving and investing your resources in next year's crops and harvests. Sweden did the same in the 1990s.

If you have a sit down and read through the detailed budget of your county (or whatever the term is in the UK - I mean we use "commune" for our lowest tier of admin, and that really says what the ideological attitude behind it all is, no?) you'll probably find that you could reduce spending by at least 1/3 just by way of basic rationalisations and pay-scale adjustments. Ten years ago, a Swedish commune tested a proto-AI algorithm for their welfare office. Easy, no? The algo checks if every box is crossed correctly and can check towards bank accounts et c to see if the statements given are correct, and then authorise payment, and pay it out, let's say 5 seconds per case to have good upper limit margin.

Anyway. What the test suggested was that public admin in all its forms can be reduced by more than 90% of staff and locales. Needless to say, the unions and politicians buried this deep.

Look at our Office of Unemployment. Budget in excess of 80 000 000 000:- (ca 7bn pounds). Average positions being filled, per clerk per month? 0.85. Zero-point-eight-five.

And we have in excess of 450 government agencies at the state level alone. . . We could probably save about 400 000 000 000:- by cutting out grift, chaff and waste, and the same again by closing the border and deporting illegals, fraudsters, and the like.

Moderate estimates by economists here is, ca 10% of GDP at least is pure waste.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts