I have friends who were raised by super-fundamentalist “Christian” parents (who are anything but), and the push of modern “liberals” (who are anything but) reminds me of these fearful, grasping parents. It’s a self perpetuating cycle: indoctrinate children out of fear, shield them from all different ways and views out of fear, control them through strict punishment and ostracizing. Sow seeds of fear and judgment and hope they grow because the alternative— conversations, questions, education, critical thinking— might lead to the “wrong” conclusions and decisions.
The problem, as fundamentalist parents often discover and as the modern left is now finding out, is that when you raise your children to be incapable of discernment, fearful, and small-minded, they might slip out of your hands and fall into the grip of other people with small-minded, reactive, undiscerning, stupid ideologies. And you just haven’t given them the tools to be full humans— thinking, discerning, churning— you’ve tried to train them like dogs. Hence the need for control and censorship.
Can I add a second option to your eerily accurate observation?
The kid in question may also rebel by trying to be the anathema of what it has been taught. Said rebellion may take the form of behaviour bordering on or crossing over into self-harm:
"Look! Look! You tried to protect me and stifled me and controlled me and now look what I'm doing!"
I remember one such girl very vividly. She was called "Mal" by her friends (means "Moth" in swedish), her parents both being child/teen psychologists working for the city, handling "problem children". They kept her on a schedule.
If she took longer than 15 minutes to get home from school, they'd report her as missing. Via their connections they had the pull to get the cops to actually bother searching.
If she wanted to "hang out" this had to be planned and scheduled a week in advance, and she had curfew after 20:00 every day of the year. Even as a teen.
When she turned 18, she packed a rucksack and a travel bag and vanished.
From her bestie (my girlfriend at the time) I learned that Mal had gone first to Amsterdam and then to Berlin (Kreuzberg) and that she had planned this disappearance since her 16th birthday.
Don't know if you ever bothered with child psychology-stuff when your kids where wee but the binary thinking of 1/0 (or whatever labels you use) is typical of the 2-4 age group; hence all the tantrums and declarative absolute statements so common to kids of that age.
Of course, since we raise kids by telling them the truth in a way they can understand and always endavour to be a good example to them by living up to our word, children quickly learn more nuanced thinking, eventually developing the ability to think in abstract concepts and to utilise meta-cognition too (typically age 20-25).
(It is at this point in class the usual suspects compulsively exclaims that /they/ were earlier, later, different, whatever seems to make them better and special, not realising that their outburst just proved them wrong.)
Now, since adults have retreated from the stage to be replaced with pereptual 14-year olds, ever since the 1940s generation had their 40-years crises in the 1980s (the 1940s generation being the original eternal 14-year olds), simplistic binary pre-pubescent thinking has become the norm in many places, especially in branches and sectors where that type of mind is an advantage (media, politics and corporate business).
Hence the logic of "Politically correct or nazi" you encounter more and more. Just as with racist, sexist, misogynist, whateverist it will drain the concept used as bogeyman of all meaning, only serving to gradually make it into just another word, eventually possibly even redeeming it like a wolf in sheep's clothing (as evidenced by US corporate and academia-culture and their questionnaires where one must state race, sex, gender, et cetera in even more detail than the actual nazis ever bothered with).
Just look at what non-white US academics and celebrities and urinalists have said - publicly, because saying it on Twitter and Fecesbook and such is saying it in public - about jews, asians and whites the last years.
What's in a name? That which we call a nazi by any other name would be just as vile.
It's quite funny to use the term "mission creep" about the ADL, which as anyone who cares to investigate will find was founded as part of a very specific attempt to run cover for a Jewish child-rapist and murderer, by framing a black man for the crime by suborning perjury, fabricating evidence and perverting the course of justice..
When your "mission" starts with that, there's nowehere left to "creep".
After the trial - in which the jury found Leo Frank the child-murdering kiddie-fiddler guilty - the citizenry saw that the "fix was in" - that Leo Frank the child-raping kiddie-murderer was to be pardoned by the Governor (in exchange for - ahem - "campaign contributions" by Frank's co-religionists).
So the citizenry forestalled the then-nascent ADLs campaign of chicanery, dragged Leo Frank the depraved child-rapist from his jail cell, and hanged Leo Frank the sick child-molester until he was dead.
Somewhere, someone might have said "Mary Phagan, thou art avenged."
That's the "origin story" for Nosferatu Greenblatte's pernicious little cabal.
Thanks so much for your views. I find you very understandable. I have not (in 3 years of constant reading in SS) seen any evidence of Nazi's writing substacks either, though as you, I do not look for that. I do contend that anyone recommending or promoting the jabs in any way is in effect suggesting people suicide themselves/be killed. So, criminal. In this same vein (badda bing...), avoiding conversations about jab damage is also a killing move imo. When Substack decided to give Shillkill Topol a featured writing position (as opposed to a regular stack), I decided I would never publish here, based on my reasoning. Words and deeds intrinsically inter-related.
I have friends who were raised by super-fundamentalist “Christian” parents (who are anything but), and the push of modern “liberals” (who are anything but) reminds me of these fearful, grasping parents. It’s a self perpetuating cycle: indoctrinate children out of fear, shield them from all different ways and views out of fear, control them through strict punishment and ostracizing. Sow seeds of fear and judgment and hope they grow because the alternative— conversations, questions, education, critical thinking— might lead to the “wrong” conclusions and decisions.
The problem, as fundamentalist parents often discover and as the modern left is now finding out, is that when you raise your children to be incapable of discernment, fearful, and small-minded, they might slip out of your hands and fall into the grip of other people with small-minded, reactive, undiscerning, stupid ideologies. And you just haven’t given them the tools to be full humans— thinking, discerning, churning— you’ve tried to train them like dogs. Hence the need for control and censorship.
Can I add a second option to your eerily accurate observation?
The kid in question may also rebel by trying to be the anathema of what it has been taught. Said rebellion may take the form of behaviour bordering on or crossing over into self-harm:
"Look! Look! You tried to protect me and stifled me and controlled me and now look what I'm doing!"
I remember one such girl very vividly. She was called "Mal" by her friends (means "Moth" in swedish), her parents both being child/teen psychologists working for the city, handling "problem children". They kept her on a schedule.
If she took longer than 15 minutes to get home from school, they'd report her as missing. Via their connections they had the pull to get the cops to actually bother searching.
If she wanted to "hang out" this had to be planned and scheduled a week in advance, and she had curfew after 20:00 every day of the year. Even as a teen.
When she turned 18, she packed a rucksack and a travel bag and vanished.
From her bestie (my girlfriend at the time) I learned that Mal had gone first to Amsterdam and then to Berlin (Kreuzberg) and that she had planned this disappearance since her 16th birthday.
Super important comment thanks.
Don't know if you ever bothered with child psychology-stuff when your kids where wee but the binary thinking of 1/0 (or whatever labels you use) is typical of the 2-4 age group; hence all the tantrums and declarative absolute statements so common to kids of that age.
Of course, since we raise kids by telling them the truth in a way they can understand and always endavour to be a good example to them by living up to our word, children quickly learn more nuanced thinking, eventually developing the ability to think in abstract concepts and to utilise meta-cognition too (typically age 20-25).
(It is at this point in class the usual suspects compulsively exclaims that /they/ were earlier, later, different, whatever seems to make them better and special, not realising that their outburst just proved them wrong.)
Now, since adults have retreated from the stage to be replaced with pereptual 14-year olds, ever since the 1940s generation had their 40-years crises in the 1980s (the 1940s generation being the original eternal 14-year olds), simplistic binary pre-pubescent thinking has become the norm in many places, especially in branches and sectors where that type of mind is an advantage (media, politics and corporate business).
Hence the logic of "Politically correct or nazi" you encounter more and more. Just as with racist, sexist, misogynist, whateverist it will drain the concept used as bogeyman of all meaning, only serving to gradually make it into just another word, eventually possibly even redeeming it like a wolf in sheep's clothing (as evidenced by US corporate and academia-culture and their questionnaires where one must state race, sex, gender, et cetera in even more detail than the actual nazis ever bothered with).
Just look at what non-white US academics and celebrities and urinalists have said - publicly, because saying it on Twitter and Fecesbook and such is saying it in public - about jews, asians and whites the last years.
What's in a name? That which we call a nazi by any other name would be just as vile.
yet our governments are happily giving our taxes and actually training ukrainian nazis
Alex Berenson wrote about the AARP recommending that eighth covid shot. https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-aarp-just-told-its-38-million?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
It's quite funny to use the term "mission creep" about the ADL, which as anyone who cares to investigate will find was founded as part of a very specific attempt to run cover for a Jewish child-rapist and murderer, by framing a black man for the crime by suborning perjury, fabricating evidence and perverting the course of justice..
When your "mission" starts with that, there's nowehere left to "creep".
After the trial - in which the jury found Leo Frank the child-murdering kiddie-fiddler guilty - the citizenry saw that the "fix was in" - that Leo Frank the child-raping kiddie-murderer was to be pardoned by the Governor (in exchange for - ahem - "campaign contributions" by Frank's co-religionists).
So the citizenry forestalled the then-nascent ADLs campaign of chicanery, dragged Leo Frank the depraved child-rapist from his jail cell, and hanged Leo Frank the sick child-molester until he was dead.
Somewhere, someone might have said "Mary Phagan, thou art avenged."
That's the "origin story" for Nosferatu Greenblatte's pernicious little cabal.
Thanks so much for your views. I find you very understandable. I have not (in 3 years of constant reading in SS) seen any evidence of Nazi's writing substacks either, though as you, I do not look for that. I do contend that anyone recommending or promoting the jabs in any way is in effect suggesting people suicide themselves/be killed. So, criminal. In this same vein (badda bing...), avoiding conversations about jab damage is also a killing move imo. When Substack decided to give Shillkill Topol a featured writing position (as opposed to a regular stack), I decided I would never publish here, based on my reasoning. Words and deeds intrinsically inter-related.