3 Comments

Indeed, a proper discussion presupposes that the other one could be right. In contrast, proper indoctrination requires there be only one answer to a problem. Sadly, the indoctrinators have established themselves firmly in our science institutions. How to dispose of them???

Expand full comment

Another very nice paen to science, the way it works over time, and some of its former practitioners, but the problem is trying to fix the underlying confused-wanker problem with only an accurate description or definition of the problem isn't directly or immediately productive. So, what would be some possible scientific approaches to solving -- or at least minimizing -- this chronic wanker problem? And, is it really a problem, or is it just an integral part (feature) of a relatively functional (and necessary) system that has its uncomfortable and ugly moments? If the latter is true, then figuring out reliable means for non-wankers to persevere through the ugly bits might be the best approach to dealing with Totalitarian Wankers et al., 2021.

Expand full comment

Dante, at your service: being unvaccinated is hell, the jabs are the terraces of purgatory (there are seven of them; take that, boosterers!), and then paradise awaits.

Expand full comment