About 1,500 Days and Counting . . . (Part V)

I was going to write about masks today, but this is part V and so it seems more appropriate to talk about this, The Holy Prick of Perfection™

Some time ago I had an idea, one of the few good original ideas I’ve had.

The idea is simple to state. Take a 2-level atom in its excited state and fire it through a lossless optical cavity at a speed such that it has a 50% probability of interacting with the (vacuum) field in the cavity and emitting a photon into the cavity. The atom, if this happens, will now be in the ground state. Then, some time later, fire a 2nd 2-level atom through the cavity, but this time in its ground state. The speed you send this one through is such that it has a 50% chance of absorbing a photon in the cavity, should there be one in there.

What you end up with is the 2 atoms being perfectly entangled with one another, despite never having directly interacted.

There’s a big problem with this idea. Not so much in the idea itself, but with the implementation of it. It’s all based on idealizations. There’s no such thing as a 2-level atom in the real world (although you can use Rydberg atoms to create a reasonable approximation to one). There’s no such thing as a lossless optical cavity. There are limits to how precisely one can pin down location and speed (Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle). And so on.

Despite these technical hurdles, the experiments were performed and demonstrated the entanglement - although a weaker level of entanglement than the perfect entanglement predicted by the idealized model.

This is how I think about vaccines - a great idea in a theoretical (idealized) sense, but one that has to overcome the technical hurdles in order to work in the real world.

The Big Prickture

The basic idea of a vaccine relies entirely on the existence of an immune system. If you don’t have one of those, vaccines won’t work for you.

The idea is rather wonderful. It was noted that people who had survived some disease were less susceptible to it again, and in some cases were completely protected from being re-infected.

If it was a really dangerous disease with a high mortality rate, then wouldn’t it be great if you could be infected with a weaker form of the same disease such that the body could (more safely) generate defences to the original? Then, if you were exposed to the nasty, original, disease you’d be a lot safer and able to fight it off.

It’s a great idea, in principle.

What causes the disease in the first place?

The fact that we have an immune system at all, and one that is adaptive, gives us an important clue. Our immune system responds to the ‘invasion’ of foreign entities. These unwanted illegal immigrants - the fungi, bacteria and viruses - need to be dealt with and, if not entirely eliminated, at least kept under control¹. That’s what our immune systems have evolved to do.

If we weren’t continually challenged by a variety of invasive pathogens that are capable of causing disease (with consequent impact on reproductive success), what would we need an immune system for? Why would it even have evolved at all?

And it isn’t just any old immune system; it’s a beaut. It’s extremely complex, highly adaptive, and is able to learn.

It’s this learning function that vaccines try to exploit.

This basic idea has been shown to work, at least in some cases. The measles vaccine was first introduced to the US in the 1960’s. At the time there were some 500,000 cases of measles every year in the US. A measles vaccine was developed by gradually weakening the original virus over many cultures. It took about 10 years if I recall correctly. This weakened, but still active (replication competent) virus was then injected into people.

What happened?

Measles is a highly contagious disease, about 6 times more contagious than covid. With only 60% vaccine coverage the number of measles cases in the US dropped off a cliff from about 500,000 to about 20,000, within a year of the introduction of the vaccine.

If we think of this in ‘experimental’ terms - it’s a damned good confirmation of the basic ideas.

It should be obvious that the covid so-called ‘vaccines’ were nowhere near this level of efficacy. We had higher vaccine coverage and almost no impact on the number of ‘cases’ - and this for a disease (covid) that was only 1/6th the contagious ‘power’ of measles.

Whatever these covid ‘vaccines’ may or may not have been doing, they weren’t protecting against infection in any appreciable way.

The first takeaway, then, is that not all vaccines are the same. It should be obvious, shouldn’t it? Not all cars are the same. Some of the crappy rusted heaps I used to have to drive when I was just starting out on my career could hardly be classed as cars at all. If you’ve ever had the misfortune to drive the mechanical monstrosity known as the Austin Allegro, you’ll know what I mean.

The covid ‘vaccines’, then, are more like the Austin Allegro end of the vaccine world.

And I meant the pun; for many, the covid ‘vaccines’ have meant the end of vaccines in their world entirely. If you’re a proponent of vaccines, and think they’re a great benefit to mankind, then the whole Pfiasco surrounding the covid ‘vaccines’ has created whole swathes of people who will never look at vaccines in the same way, ever again.

If you’re pro-vax, then you should have realized that the whole covid ‘vaccine’ mess achieved the very opposite of what you think is good. This is why pro-vax people should have been against the ridiculous propaganda and coercion - because all it has achieved is to create massively more vaccine ‘hesitancy’ than ever existed before. The numbers of the vaccine ‘hesitant’ has hugely increased.

I’m one of them. Originally, before covid, I was definitely pro-vax. I thought they were, like I’d had continually drummed into me, a medical miracle. I no longer think this way. I’m not at all certain any more that they have been a net benefit to mankind.

So, What The Pfuck Happened?

Broadly speaking, I’d like to use the three W’s to characterize the 3 main factors - none of which are anything to do with ‘health’.

• Wealth : somewhat self-explanatory

• WEF : a shorthand for the globalist aims and ambitions of the ‘elite’

• Willy-Comparisons² : a shorthand for the naked lust for the acquisition of power

Schoolboy humour aside, these 3 factors of Wealth, Globalisation, and Power were, in my view, the driving forces behind the whole covid Pfarce.

It’s important to recall the context here. The whole mess could only have happened if there was a truly deadly and unprecedented health threat that scared people enough. This was the key, or as I have called it, The One Lie To Rule Them All.

The first red flag, then, is to recall the extraordinary efforts that were undertaken to convince us all that we were facing such a deadly threat. Right from the start, from those hilariously stupid videos of people collapsing on the street in China, all the way through to various ‘winters of death’ (for the unvaccinated, of course) we were bombarded with relentless DOOM propaganda. Daily death counts, images of struggling hospitals (although the dance routines might have told another story), and those laughable “I wish I had been vaccinated” comedy routines, to name but a very few.

Everything was designed to make us fear.

Yet, curiously, the people in ‘charge’, the people who had access to all of the best data, our politicians, were not themselves afraid. They’d wear masks for the cameras, socially distance for the cameras, and tell us all that gatherings were really dangerous.

Yet these grotesque hypocrites gathered and schemed and partied (maskless) together whilst subjecting the rest of us to unrelenting misery. It’s not the hypocrisy that is pertinent. After all, we expect most of our politicians to be rank hypocrites - it’s almost part of the job description. No, the point is that they, themselves, didn’t believe the crap they were spouting.

These are people who had access to the best data. They weren’t afraid. Let that sink in for a while.

These are the people who tried to tell us we needed to “build back better” before most of us could even properly spell asymptomatic.

One explanation for this behaviour, and it’s definitely a factor I think, is that they were worried about what their voters would think of them if they ‘did nothing’. But that doesn’t really properly explain the absurd overreaction to a threat they knew to be of only mild to moderate severity. Nor does it properly explain the level of fear they deliberately tried to generate.

This is something I keep going on about - because it’s important. The context of the wholly unnecessary generation of extreme fear is the One Ring that controls everything else.

The other thing to consider is the extreme reaction to any who would deviate from the fear narrative, or who tried to treat covid as if it were (as it was) a disease of only mild to moderate severity overall.

Sweden, as we know, decided to follow the science, rather than The Science™ and opted to do (more or less) what their previous pandemic planning had advised. They were vilified. They were described as conducting an inhumane ‘experiment’ on their population when, in reality, it was everyone else who was indulging in the non-scientific experiments of stupid interventions.

Sweden, for whatever reason, followed the evidence. Most other places decided, based upon no evidence whatsoever, to do all sorts of made-up shit that was invented out of whole cloth and described as “science”.

This, then, is the background. It’s the fertile soil in which the vaccine seed could be planted.

The Pfertilization of the Pfear

Let’s imagine you were the head of a Pharmaceutical company. Oh, I don’t know, let’s call you Integrity Jones. Let’s call your outfit Drugs R Us. What might you want to happen?

1. The emergence of a deadly new pathogen

2. The ability to create a (supposed) vaccine for it in record time

3. The non-existence of any other effective treatments

4. The imposition of draconian measures so that the vaccines could be painted as ‘saving’ you from both the disease and the introduced measures

5. A level of coercion applied that was a mandate in all but name

Of course, being practically Gandhi, Mother Theresa, and Jesus all rolled into one, you wouldn’t actually want this would you?

You certainly wouldn’t do everything in your power to make any of these things come about.

You might also Pfantasize about getting it onto the childhood vaccine schedule because that’s what keeps the big bucks rolling in year upon year. Then, of course, you’d go to confession for having such wicked thoughts.

I don’t for one moment believe that Pharma sets out to make bad products. I don’t think they’re all that interested in curing stuff, though. That’s not a good business model. You basically want stuff that alleviates symptoms, so that there’s a continual market for your products.

But there’s also far too much financial incentive to fudge things so that a mediocre (or, even worse, useless) product you’ve spent millions on developing looks to be much better than it is.

And, let’s face it, they’ve been caught red-handed before. They have been found guilty of all sorts of shady practices and been fined billions. This will be just the tip of a very ugly iceberg.

To pretend that, miraculously, they changed their ways when covid arrived on the scene is naivety with naïve knobs on.

But pretend we did.

There’s nothing wrong with wanting to scrutinize in extraordinary detail the trial data, for example. Yet in the US a government agency, partly set up to protect (?!!!!!) the public from bad Pharma, wanted this data to be unavailable for over half a century.

If you can’t smell the whiff of corruption here, then maybe you have covid.

The people in influential positions in these official government institutions would never be offered lucrative jobs in Pharma when they resign, would they? Of course not. The very idea is unthinkable. Would never happen.

Sir, I’ve hit him over the head with a dozen red flags and he’s still not noticed.

Try shoving one up his arse then.

Nope. He still hasn’t noticed.

How many red flags do we need to be assaulted with before we realize that something is rotten in the state of Pharmistan?

Even in the early trial data that was released, the carefully crafted trial data released by Pharma, it was evident that overall morbidity was higher in the vaccinated cohort. It wasn’t a small effect, either, but easily passed the usual threshold for statistical significance.

We had the deliberate and fraudulent attacks on promising alternative treatment protocols that used Ivermectin or HCQ. The FDA - that government agency that likes to suck up to Pharma by hiding trial data - even went as far as claiming that Ivermectin was a horse de-wormer not fit for humans. This despite the fact that Ivermectin has been used by millions, maybe billions, of people (you know, humans) as an extremely safe and effective drug with known anti-viral properties.

Who, one might ask, are the FDA actually protecting?

This was a critical step for Pharma. The ‘vaccines’ were allowed on an “emergency” use basis. This EAU (Emergency Use Authorization) could only be issued if there were no other options available. It was vital for Pharma’s profits that no such alternative was available.

You’re seriously not going to tell me that Integrity Jones just crossed his fingers and hoped for the best, are you? That the FDA just ‘innocently’ slandered a highly effective medication used worldwide that also happens to be one of the safest pharmaceutical products known?

If you think this was just a bunch of people doing their best for the ‘health’ of others, I don’t know what to say to you. Even if something like Ivermectin was only 10% effective (in reducing death) when used early enough, then it was worth trying. But no. They banned it and prevented doctors from prescribing it - even for its ‘on label’ use.

Recall that Ivermectin was known to be extremely safe. When faced with a deadly pandemic, as we allegedly were, it makes no sense not to try every possibility.

No sense unless you want to maximise profits from vaccines, that is.

And then, of course, the role of vitamin D in maintaining a healthy and vigorous immune system was entirely downplayed.

And we had the new ‘discovery’ of something called hybrid immunity in which those who had already had covid, and therefore already possessed a level of acquired immunity, could super-size it by getting the vaccine. This hybrid immunity was, we were told, in all respects superior to disease-acquired immunity.

What repeated shots did, of course, was to give one a reasonable chance of fucking up your immune system.

Not to mention the side effects like myocarditis. At least we can actually talk about that one now. At the start of this, the covid ‘vaccines’ were talked about as if they were the supreme example of vaccinology. No other vaccine could be quite as wonderful as this 100% effective and 100% safe technological ‘miracle’ developed at warp speed.

Everyone got in on the act.

From Popes to Politicians, Singers and Superstars, they all had their allotted propaganda slots to tell us just how jolly good the Juice of Joy™ was.

You may have been mildly encouraged to get a flu vaccine in the past, but the amount of effort and money that went into promoting the covid shots was off-the-scale deranged and deranging. It was demeaning, dehumanizing, and deceitful.

Even the Chief Vacuum-Head in the Vatican, the Pontifical Prat himself, weighed in. It was the Christian thing to do. Jesus, himself, would have gotten the jab. Perhaps his miraculous powers didn’t extend to curing covid, then?

They tried every which way to convince us. If Jesus wasn’t your thing, then maybe a free donut would convince you? Or, in Germany, one brothel offered a free session if you’d been vaccinated. Perhaps you should have been vaccinated against the clap at the same time.

When these inducements weren’t enough, they went all authoritarian. People lost their jobs for not being juiced up with the Sacred WooWoo Gloop. This despite the knowledge, common even then, that this atrocious goo did little to mitigate against transmission.

By this time, of course, lots of people had already had covid and there was a growing realization that it, perhaps, wasn’t quite the existential scourge that it had been portrayed as. The fear had worn off a bit and so they needed the stick, because the covid carrot had been chomped on.

The sheer level of propaganda, the ridiculous over exaggeration employed, the absurd statements that made no sense (nobody is safe until everybody is safe), were of a scale and pervasiveness unlike anything we’ve ever seen for a medical product before.

All for a disease that was (overall) of mild to moderate severity, at best.

Isn’t it obvious, by now, that there were other factors besides merely ‘health’ at play here?

---

And so it’s time to juice myself up. Today, I have a chilled banana and butterscotch rum shot waiting - I can promise you it’s every bit as effective as a covid shot. And given that each covid shot increases your chances of getting covid, I think it’s safe to say it’s more effective.

1. And, over thousands and thousands of years of evolution, some of those invaders have become an essential part of us. They exist in a mutually beneficial kind of symbiosis with our bodies.

2. In the UK the term ‘willy’ is a slang word for penis.