The "gay rights movement" has proven itself to be beyond any doubt nothing but a front for pedophiles grooming children. And pedophiles will never ever stop once they start.
The reason they cannot stop is because they are unable, incapable, of perceiving or feeling that their urges are wrong. Pedophilia is incurable, leaving only two options if children are to be protected.
There's really nothing more to say on that, not anymore than why murder can only ever have one of two just and fair punishments.
There are, simply put, actions which cannot be taken back or atoned for.
About voting and democracy: the most democratic and fair system has never been tried, for a simple reason:
It cannot be manipulated (excepting outright fraud and cheating of course, but that's always on the table no matter the system) to ensure reigning elites and upper classes remain in power and control.
And what is this system, you ask, wearily?
Lottery.
By giving anyone of voting age (add on requirements such as being compos mentis, legal citizen et cetera) an equal chance of being selected by random chance for becoming PM, MP, councilor in charge of polishing the Blarney Stone, what have you - total and perfect equitable representation of the voting public is ensured.
Sure, there are details to be hammered out, such as what to do if agony aunt Agatha ain't interested, and so on but those are petty details akin to having a row with the hairdresser about each and every follicle.
And lottery would make lobbying, permanent iunfluence-structures, and so on nigh on impossible: banks and corpos simply cannot groom each and every candidate, nor can they butter up and compromise every one who's been selected for service - there will always be that principled plummer from Scunthorpe that goes public with political-corporate dirty laundry, just to stick one in the eye of the plutocratic ponces.
Give it serious thought. Everyone, at every election, has a 1 in how many tens of million chance of becoming PM/MP, for one term and one term only. You think a House of Parliament or a Reichstag consisting of Joe the Plummer, Abdul the greengrocer and Oisin the chimneysweep would vote for closing off children's playgrounds to "stop Covid" or vote for an abomination like the Scottich Hate-law?
They wouldn't. What they would vote for is, when a chinless wonder pipes up in indignant falsetto about sending billions to Ukraine's puppet-regime, they'd say: "Sure mate, but you and your chums from the club go with the money, and you'll be the first to go over the top, fair dinkums, no?"
I don't agree with your take on the gay rights movement - I don't believe homosexual people are any more predisposed to paedophilia than heterosexual people are.
But if you're talking about how the original GRM has morphed into this new WAFRM (weird as fuck rights movement), then I think some paedophiles are using it as a cover.
The WTF part of the LGBWTF "community" is definitely not a natural bedfellow (so to speak) of the LBG part.
I've no problem with gay rights as they were originally conceived. I think it's a good thing that people who are attracted to members of their own sex are not discriminated against.
The main problem is how we 'educate' our children about all these kinds of things. In my view there's a huge difference between education and promotion. What we're seeing now in schools is a *promotion* of a ruinous and dangerous ideology.
My lessons on the topic would be very short : Some people are different. Don't be an asshole.
Today we seem to be hell-bent on teaching kids about their assholes instead.
Well, that's where you're wrong, I'm sorry to say: homosexual men are extremely over-represented among pedophiles. Not all homosexual men are pedophiles, far from it, but the majority of pedophiles are also homosexuals or "equal opportunity sexual predators".
That's been well-known for over 50 years and isn't really in dispute. It's just that it's not the way it's supposed to be according to how homosexuality has been framed since the 1970s, same as it is with lesbians and spousal abuse: both frequency and severity far outstrips that of heterosexual couples.
And having been a supporting member once of the swedish RFSL (eq. to GLAAD in the US), I can say with some authority that yes, acceptance of pedophilia is almost universal among homosexual men - it is seen as natural, even. They draw the line not according to age but along consent, meaning that if an adult can get a child to "consent", then it's okay. Most have no problem at all with the idea of a forty-year old man courting a pre-pubescent boy, as long as there's "consent". This ties back into why pedophilia is incurable (for the same reason sociopathy is): the pedophile is unable - not unwilling, unable - to perceive any wrongdoing on his part.
And the gay rights movement is deathly afraid of splintering, which is why those who have argued for them to "police their own" re: pedophiles, rapists and abusers have been consistently ostracised and silenced, so as not to hurt "the struggle". In the 1980s, arguing for monogamy and using condoms was seen as an attack on "gay rights", despite the AIDS epidemic. Ideology and group cohesiveness outweighed reality, though that isn't in any way unique to the gay movement, of course. Just look at feminism, migration or Covid.
The main problem for the gay rights movement is the same as with all progressive and liberal ideology: it cannot stop and be done, because it compares reality to a theoretical and abstract ideal. Therefore, it's never enough. And the gay rights movement has consistently argued for abolishing or lowering the age of consent, ever since the 1950s. In Sweden, age of consent is 15 and they want it lowered to 12 or abolished; the most gay-friendly parties in parliament has even adopted the idea that age be stricken from the law, and consent alone should decide.
I really wish you were right on this, because that would be better for all involved, but that's simply not the way it is.
Edit: To clarify, because the internet is the way it is: I don't mean "sorry" in some passive-aggressive way - I mean I'm really sorry that it is the way it is, and even more so since we as societies no longer try to protect children from pedophiles, quite the opposite as evidenced by too many examples to mention. How people like Libs of TikTok and GaysAgainstGroomers don't break down, I'll never understand.
Here, a former athlete himself a victim of pedohile homosexuals as a child has started a group called "Dumpen" (The Dump, as in info-dump) tracking, trailing and trapping pedophiles. Naturally, the media and the celebrities have come out in force. Against him and his co-workers.
The narrative that pedophilia and homosexuality are unconnected is simply too strong and article of faith.
Where do you get the idea that pedophilia is more represented in homosexual males? I remember reading a something that showed the percentage of sexual abuse of underage kids was about the same for heterosexual men and homosexual men. Anyway, since heterosexual men FAR OUTNUMBER homosexual men, WAY MORE girls are assaulted by heterosexual men, than boys and men assaulted by homosexual men. This is something the heterosexual community sometimes seems to deny about the men in their community. Is there a bit of projection going on - projecting pedophilia onto the homosexual community, while not recognizing the huge problem of rape and molestation of girls by heterosexual men?
A way too large percentage of girls around the world have experienced rape, sexual assault, or molestation by men. There are way more girls than boys involved in sex trafficking by men. In some communities around the world, it's okay to take child brides and have sex with underage girls. In some places it's considered normal sexual aggression for men to act out their sexual attraction to teenage women by raping them. In Western advertising campaigns for decades there's been the sexualization of underage girls. . Open your eyes and join reality. The truth is, kids are safest from sexual assault around lesbian couples.
Any childhood rape is truly terrible and life-altering for boys and girls.
There are many LGBs who reject what is happening now in the modern trans movement.
The thing about the people who “can’t” obtain voter ID is that usually they actually don’t care that much about voting. The mission of get-out-the-vote campaigns here in the US often seems to be to browbeat people who are uninformed and ill-informed and don’t give a damn to fill in a box next to Our Candidate. The disingenuousness of it repels me. It’s like raising a generation of kids who think there’s no point in learning unless it’s gonna be on the exam. It’s why the democrats are worse: they couch trying to make their candidate win in the language of “democracy” and this ennoble prioritizing ignorance over education, party politics over critical thinking.
They must have thought - kids love rainbows and monkeys. They also giggle at butt jokes. There's the dildo thing but - hey, three out of four - you can't have it all.
As for the ID thingy - check this out. It's probably creatively edited to show the stupidity full scale, but still funny.
Some truly outstanding polemic with almost no sweary bits, from a very angry man, about the state of society in the USA. Applicable of course to the UK, Australia and any other place where the demons have assumed control.
This bloke simply nails it, in every dimension that needs nailing.
It looks like the library contracted with another organization that hired rainbow dildo butt monkey. The other organization apologized, but I think they simply felt bad about getting rightly called out! The good thing is now hopefully other libraries know to not hire such things out.
While way more girls get sexually abused by heterosexual men, than boys do by homosexual men, your article made me ponder about going to the San Francisco gay pride parade 30 years ago, when I was in my 20s. In just the first two parades I went to, "The man - boy love association" openly marched in the parade - to absolute silence from the crowd. They were run out of mainstream gay society at least in the Bay Area. I wonder if they have a re-emerged in the modern trans movement. I've never seen such public sexualization of children (outside of the sexualization of girls in Western media that's been happening for decades). I even ventured into the hardcore leather part of the SF parade on another street, and there was no sexualization of boys. That whole pedophilia movement got pushed underground I assume... or maybe they disbanded, I don't know. But it just occurred to me that they have found a way to collectively group together again more openly in the modern trans movement.
The "gay rights movement" has proven itself to be beyond any doubt nothing but a front for pedophiles grooming children. And pedophiles will never ever stop once they start.
The reason they cannot stop is because they are unable, incapable, of perceiving or feeling that their urges are wrong. Pedophilia is incurable, leaving only two options if children are to be protected.
There's really nothing more to say on that, not anymore than why murder can only ever have one of two just and fair punishments.
There are, simply put, actions which cannot be taken back or atoned for.
About voting and democracy: the most democratic and fair system has never been tried, for a simple reason:
It cannot be manipulated (excepting outright fraud and cheating of course, but that's always on the table no matter the system) to ensure reigning elites and upper classes remain in power and control.
And what is this system, you ask, wearily?
Lottery.
By giving anyone of voting age (add on requirements such as being compos mentis, legal citizen et cetera) an equal chance of being selected by random chance for becoming PM, MP, councilor in charge of polishing the Blarney Stone, what have you - total and perfect equitable representation of the voting public is ensured.
Sure, there are details to be hammered out, such as what to do if agony aunt Agatha ain't interested, and so on but those are petty details akin to having a row with the hairdresser about each and every follicle.
And lottery would make lobbying, permanent iunfluence-structures, and so on nigh on impossible: banks and corpos simply cannot groom each and every candidate, nor can they butter up and compromise every one who's been selected for service - there will always be that principled plummer from Scunthorpe that goes public with political-corporate dirty laundry, just to stick one in the eye of the plutocratic ponces.
Give it serious thought. Everyone, at every election, has a 1 in how many tens of million chance of becoming PM/MP, for one term and one term only. You think a House of Parliament or a Reichstag consisting of Joe the Plummer, Abdul the greengrocer and Oisin the chimneysweep would vote for closing off children's playgrounds to "stop Covid" or vote for an abomination like the Scottich Hate-law?
They wouldn't. What they would vote for is, when a chinless wonder pipes up in indignant falsetto about sending billions to Ukraine's puppet-regime, they'd say: "Sure mate, but you and your chums from the club go with the money, and you'll be the first to go over the top, fair dinkums, no?"
I don't agree with your take on the gay rights movement - I don't believe homosexual people are any more predisposed to paedophilia than heterosexual people are.
But if you're talking about how the original GRM has morphed into this new WAFRM (weird as fuck rights movement), then I think some paedophiles are using it as a cover.
The WTF part of the LGBWTF "community" is definitely not a natural bedfellow (so to speak) of the LBG part.
I've no problem with gay rights as they were originally conceived. I think it's a good thing that people who are attracted to members of their own sex are not discriminated against.
The main problem is how we 'educate' our children about all these kinds of things. In my view there's a huge difference between education and promotion. What we're seeing now in schools is a *promotion* of a ruinous and dangerous ideology.
My lessons on the topic would be very short : Some people are different. Don't be an asshole.
Today we seem to be hell-bent on teaching kids about their assholes instead.
Well, that's where you're wrong, I'm sorry to say: homosexual men are extremely over-represented among pedophiles. Not all homosexual men are pedophiles, far from it, but the majority of pedophiles are also homosexuals or "equal opportunity sexual predators".
That's been well-known for over 50 years and isn't really in dispute. It's just that it's not the way it's supposed to be according to how homosexuality has been framed since the 1970s, same as it is with lesbians and spousal abuse: both frequency and severity far outstrips that of heterosexual couples.
And having been a supporting member once of the swedish RFSL (eq. to GLAAD in the US), I can say with some authority that yes, acceptance of pedophilia is almost universal among homosexual men - it is seen as natural, even. They draw the line not according to age but along consent, meaning that if an adult can get a child to "consent", then it's okay. Most have no problem at all with the idea of a forty-year old man courting a pre-pubescent boy, as long as there's "consent". This ties back into why pedophilia is incurable (for the same reason sociopathy is): the pedophile is unable - not unwilling, unable - to perceive any wrongdoing on his part.
And the gay rights movement is deathly afraid of splintering, which is why those who have argued for them to "police their own" re: pedophiles, rapists and abusers have been consistently ostracised and silenced, so as not to hurt "the struggle". In the 1980s, arguing for monogamy and using condoms was seen as an attack on "gay rights", despite the AIDS epidemic. Ideology and group cohesiveness outweighed reality, though that isn't in any way unique to the gay movement, of course. Just look at feminism, migration or Covid.
The main problem for the gay rights movement is the same as with all progressive and liberal ideology: it cannot stop and be done, because it compares reality to a theoretical and abstract ideal. Therefore, it's never enough. And the gay rights movement has consistently argued for abolishing or lowering the age of consent, ever since the 1950s. In Sweden, age of consent is 15 and they want it lowered to 12 or abolished; the most gay-friendly parties in parliament has even adopted the idea that age be stricken from the law, and consent alone should decide.
I really wish you were right on this, because that would be better for all involved, but that's simply not the way it is.
Edit: To clarify, because the internet is the way it is: I don't mean "sorry" in some passive-aggressive way - I mean I'm really sorry that it is the way it is, and even more so since we as societies no longer try to protect children from pedophiles, quite the opposite as evidenced by too many examples to mention. How people like Libs of TikTok and GaysAgainstGroomers don't break down, I'll never understand.
Here, a former athlete himself a victim of pedohile homosexuals as a child has started a group called "Dumpen" (The Dump, as in info-dump) tracking, trailing and trapping pedophiles. Naturally, the media and the celebrities have come out in force. Against him and his co-workers.
The narrative that pedophilia and homosexuality are unconnected is simply too strong and article of faith.
Where do you get the idea that pedophilia is more represented in homosexual males? I remember reading a something that showed the percentage of sexual abuse of underage kids was about the same for heterosexual men and homosexual men. Anyway, since heterosexual men FAR OUTNUMBER homosexual men, WAY MORE girls are assaulted by heterosexual men, than boys and men assaulted by homosexual men. This is something the heterosexual community sometimes seems to deny about the men in their community. Is there a bit of projection going on - projecting pedophilia onto the homosexual community, while not recognizing the huge problem of rape and molestation of girls by heterosexual men?
A way too large percentage of girls around the world have experienced rape, sexual assault, or molestation by men. There are way more girls than boys involved in sex trafficking by men. In some communities around the world, it's okay to take child brides and have sex with underage girls. In some places it's considered normal sexual aggression for men to act out their sexual attraction to teenage women by raping them. In Western advertising campaigns for decades there's been the sexualization of underage girls. . Open your eyes and join reality. The truth is, kids are safest from sexual assault around lesbian couples.
Any childhood rape is truly terrible and life-altering for boys and girls.
There are many LGBs who reject what is happening now in the modern trans movement.
The thing about the people who “can’t” obtain voter ID is that usually they actually don’t care that much about voting. The mission of get-out-the-vote campaigns here in the US often seems to be to browbeat people who are uninformed and ill-informed and don’t give a damn to fill in a box next to Our Candidate. The disingenuousness of it repels me. It’s like raising a generation of kids who think there’s no point in learning unless it’s gonna be on the exam. It’s why the democrats are worse: they couch trying to make their candidate win in the language of “democracy” and this ennoble prioritizing ignorance over education, party politics over critical thinking.
They must have thought - kids love rainbows and monkeys. They also giggle at butt jokes. There's the dildo thing but - hey, three out of four - you can't have it all.
As for the ID thingy - check this out. It's probably creatively edited to show the stupidity full scale, but still funny.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JGmKHrWKMQ
wow - the benefits of a 'liberal' education, eh?
Some truly outstanding polemic with almost no sweary bits, from a very angry man, about the state of society in the USA. Applicable of course to the UK, Australia and any other place where the demons have assumed control.
This bloke simply nails it, in every dimension that needs nailing.
https://twitter.com/robertdunlap947/status/1776638502546931889
That's an awesome rant - a bit US specific in places but broadly applicable to anywhere this woke woo woo has taken hold
It looks like the library contracted with another organization that hired rainbow dildo butt monkey. The other organization apologized, but I think they simply felt bad about getting rightly called out! The good thing is now hopefully other libraries know to not hire such things out.
While way more girls get sexually abused by heterosexual men, than boys do by homosexual men, your article made me ponder about going to the San Francisco gay pride parade 30 years ago, when I was in my 20s. In just the first two parades I went to, "The man - boy love association" openly marched in the parade - to absolute silence from the crowd. They were run out of mainstream gay society at least in the Bay Area. I wonder if they have a re-emerged in the modern trans movement. I've never seen such public sexualization of children (outside of the sexualization of girls in Western media that's been happening for decades). I even ventured into the hardcore leather part of the SF parade on another street, and there was no sexualization of boys. That whole pedophilia movement got pushed underground I assume... or maybe they disbanded, I don't know. But it just occurred to me that they have found a way to collectively group together again more openly in the modern trans movement.