They keep going after all that pesky “misinformation”, but they just can’t seem to properly stop it.
Dr Robert Malone was boosted off Twitter and yet his podcast with Joe Rogan, just a day or two later, has had over 50 millions listens, making it the biggest single podcast ever. So now a bunch of doctors are calling for Joe Rogan to be censored (what a surprise!). Dr Malone might be spouting the most egregiously wrong BS ever spoken (he isn’t), but that isn’t the point. The point is whether we want governments to be able to restrict the public information and opinions we have access to.
That data just keeps coming in and hanging off the door lintels as the government and its media dogs vainly try to chase it down.
Here’s just a small selection of “inconvenient” truths - showing just how spiffingly well it’s all been going. It’s pretty much a universal picture across the world. Omicron has run a horse and cart through the notion that things like lockdowns, masks, or the Goo, bring any benefit in halting transmission.
Here’s another really quite revealing chart
There appears to be no significant difference between the outcomes in the 10 most and 10 least vaccinated states. If anything, it looks a bit worse for the most vaccinated states. One thing I don’t know is how big of a difference between most and least there is here. Is the average level of vaccination for the most vaccinated states 80% and for the least 75%, for example? I’m going to assume the difference is more than that (otherwise the chart would be meaningless).
If the vaccines work, why do they appear not to be working?
It’s a puzzle, because data from other places (like the UKHSA) does indicate some effectiveness of the Goo in the prevention of death. Whatever the truth of the matter here I would suggest that, even if the Goo works in preventing death, it’s not anything like at the level of the oft-claimed 90% efficacy.
What is very clear, however, is that the vaccines are doing sweet Fanny Adams in terms of reducing cases at the moment - and there are strong indications they’re making things worse here.
Back in the days when we knew what a vaccine was (and what a man/woman was) it was understood that the purpose of a vaccine was to confer immunity. You weren’t given a vaccine to reduce symptoms when you got a virus - no - it was to stop the bugger before it could give you symptoms. It was intended to provide a break in transmission, to close off all the exits off Virus Boulevard so that the little nanomachine of doom had nowhere to go.
With the Glorious Goo, The Holy Ejaculate of Pfizer, we have a ‘vaccine’ that does not provide an effective break in transmission, but was designed to reduce symptoms (that’s what it was tested for in the trials). We used to call these kind of things prophylactics. By this current criterion we could legitimately call things like Ivermectin and HCQ “vaccines”.
Having scraped this naughty information off the door lintels we might have cause to be optimistic. Surely now, even the most ardent devotees of the SCIENCE™, those fervent acolytes of the Sacred Covid Catechism, must be aware something isn’t adding up with their great vision of Health Enhancement by Lockdown Lunacy (HELL)?
Not a bit of it. From the Daily Telegraph we have a set of tweets looking at the increasing measures aimed at the unvaccinated. Here’s just a couple in the thread.
Despite the evidence, governments across the world are ramping up their punishment of the Goo-free - and even the double jabbed, the GooGoo’s, are finding themselves no longer quite as “free” as promised in some places.
We did try to tell them. But as Thomas Sowell wisely said:
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance
Have a look at Devi Sridhar’s words in the tweet. They are just wrong. This particular “Professor” does have quite a track record in getting things completely wrong when it comes to covid - but, of course, no call for censorship here. No call to pull the plug on the Telegraph for allowing a dangerous spreader of “misinformation” to propagate her ridiculous nonsense. I wouldn’t want her, or the Telegraph, to be censored. I would like to see a reasonably level playing field, however.
But I keep coming back to that very important question. Why?
Why are the world’s governments so keen to get this Goo into every arm they can? Why are they doubling down on measures to punish the unvaccinated when the data is quite clearly showing that vaccination is having no discernible effect on cases or transmission? Even if the Goo were doing the job of a good old-fashioned vaccine, I would not agree with punitive measures being applied to those who, for whatever reason, decide not to be vaccinated. Bodily autonomy has to be a fundamental right. And “rights” contingent upon circumstance are not rights at all - they are merely privileges to be granted if circumstance permits.
And that’s OK if that’s how we decide we want to live, our lives dependent on the existence of government-granted privileges, but let’s ditch any talk of “rights” in that case.
One very important thing to bear in mind has been the pernicious mission creep. Lockdowns were initially proposed to slow things down. This oozed seamlessly into lockdowns “save lives”.
The vaccines were primarily for the vulnerable and once this goal had been achieved things could open up - which didn’t just ooze, but gushed, into get this Goo into anything with a pulse.
Now that Omicron appears to be repeatedly clubbing (with its horribly mutated spike-ridden club) the notion that the Goo reduces transmission we’ve seen the arguments do the ooze yet again. “You should do your duty to protect others” has become you should do your duty to protect health services. The argument has shifted. But we’re kind of used to this aren’t we?
I think we’re very close to a tipping point. We’re going to see a complete collapse of the narrative either way, I think, but I don’t think we’re going to see governments admit this anytime soon. What appears to be happening in many places is a ramping up of the Goo lust. Like porn addicts, they appear to be going for ever more extreme fixes. The old stuff just doesn’t excite them anymore. Lockdowns used to give them a Rona Boner, but now they need to do the vaccine bukkake* to satiate themselves.
We’re going to have to hang on to those door lintels a while longer yet.
*(If you don’t know what “bukkake” is I applaud you - I wish I didn’t - once seen it’s hard to unsee. Maybe Pharma could do something useful, for once, and develop a selective memory blocker - that’s something I might consider taking in this instance).
Great post. And I had never heard of bukkake, being the innocent person that I am, and now I can't unsee it! 🙀
'You weren’t given a vaccine to reduce symptoms when you got a virus - no - it was to stop the bugger before it could give you symptoms.'
Something we don't know, as far as I'm aware, is whether endless testing with highly sensitive tests would, in the past, have revealed the presence of virus in many more people who were unaffected and, therefore, presumed immune.
It would be interesting to know how many people have been Covid positive more than once, whether symptoms accompanied the first or later positives, and when any vaccination took place relative to the timing of these tests.