The illuminati elites at WEF are at it again. We shouldn’t be surprised. We did tell you this is what they were about - but what do we know? We’re just a bunch of wacky conspiracy theorists who don’t know their fundament from their antecubital fossa (which roughly translates as not knowing one’s arse from one’s elbow).
Sometimes the only sane response is the following
Helen Clark, who was the 38th Mouth of Sauron Prime Minister of New Zealand, had the following to say during one of those oh so revealing Q&A sessions at Davos.
The reality is that political resolve to fight covid is waning. Popular support for measures is waning. The people are over covid. The problem is it's not done with us, but we're in danger of losing this moment for transformative change. And let's face it, people are still dying in significant numbers every day. People still developing long covid every day. Low income countries are horribly, horribly under vaccinated. We've got issues here and now. I think another reason is that the package of things that has to happen is trans-sector and there hasn't yet been an effort to try and bring together a head of state and government level focus on the range of things that needs to be done.
You can see the clip (47s) here
Maybe Helen wasn’t in the same part of the multiverse as I was for the last couple of years, but what I saw was a largely uniform response to covid across the world. This may, or may not, have been coordinated - although the media messaging, manipulation and censorship were certainly coordinated - but what she seems to want is to be able to compel that coordination now and in the future.
I’ve been banging on for a while about how we need to squash, permanently, this notion that the performative nonsense we’ve indulged in in a futile attempt to control a virus is the right thing to do. What I hadn’t properly twigged until I read Alex Klaushofer’s excellent piece yesterday was just how dangerous this WHO pandemic treaty thing really is
Yes, all the remarks people have made about national sovereignty are apposite - of course they are - but perhaps the real danger is that the batshit insane pandemic response of most governments, WHICH DID NOT WORK, is going to be normalized and enshrined into international law.
These people actually think they did the right thing. Or at least they pretend to do so. They’re going to do it again - only next time they don’t want anyone to have the opportunity to say “You what? You sentient bag of custard. Just bugger off”
Do you have any doubt that the “package of things that has to happen” will not focus on sensible stuff like if you’re ill, keep yourself away from others as best you can. Or will it focus on society-wide measures like masks, lockdowns, distancing, plastic screens, one-way systems, vaxx passports, and trying not to infect people on your way to the bathroom for a pee?
Do you think that the response to the next health “emergency” will be proportionate, reasonable and successful? Or will it be more of the same, only harder, faster, longer?
Which reminds me of more schoolboy humour :
Q: what should you do if your girlfriend starts smoking?
A: use more lubricant
Except we’re the people getting rogered - and they sure as hell aren’t going to use lubricant.
Look carefully at Clark’s words. First of all note the fearporn. People are, she tells us, still dying in significant numbers every day. No, they’re not. They’re really not. Then she raises the spectre of long covid, as if post-viral syndrome is somehow different for covid. It’s all part of the “covid is unique” mythology they’ve tried to weave.
She is cognizant of the fact that people have had enough, that they’re noticing that covid is no longer the demon-spawn of Wuhan come to slay mankind, and that all of the irredeemably stupid and fascistic shit they’ve had to deal with over the last couple of years has caused way more damage than the virus itself.
She doesn’t want that, though. She wants us all to still be afraid. Because without the fear it will not be possible to push through the radical changes she wants. She is afraid, not about covid, but because they are
losing this moment for transformative change
Whether this was all planned, or simply seized upon as a golden opportunity, you can see the real goal here. It is a radical change; a global change.
There is such a strong element of “we know what’s best for you” in this little speech that, even after several showers, I haven’t been able to wash away the smell of the shite.
Her compassion for “low-income countries” is astounding. Apparently, they are “horribly, horribly, under vaccinated”. OK - maybe they are, technically speaking, but one would then suppose they’ve been laid waste by covid in a way that more well-off countries haven’t? It would appear, from the data, to be quite the opposite!
The concern here isn’t that low-income countries are having a much worse time with covid (they aren’t) but that they haven’t been vaccinated enough. They have not been able to submit to the health fascism measures adopted by the wealthy - and that’s unacceptable in her eyes.
The problem with a globally coordinated response, presumably dictated by the WHO, is not really the global nature of it, or the coordination. It’s the assumption that a single entity (like the WHO, for example) will choose to do the right thing. It assumes they even know what that right thing is!
As we’ve seen, the various things we’ve been forced to do have been about as much use as a carboard hammer (thanks to Terry Pratchett for that one). They clearly didn’t work - and it’s so painfully obvious to anyone with even the most rudimentary skills at data analysis that they haven’t worked. That would be bad enough - but those measures have also caused so much damage, and have actually made things worse.
What we’re seeing now, mostly in the vaccinated, is a very unnatural progression of disease. We’ve altered the disease dynamics by our vaccinal god-complex. If we’d let well alone - just treated this as if it were another flu - we’d be done and dusted by now. Covid would still be with us, of course, but we’d be way past the worst and we’d be able to afford things like food and petrol.
But, no, our puppet masters want to be able to impose this nonsense upon us whenever they like. Climate change? Well that affects people’s health right? Now we have a pretext, and a mechanism, like never before, to impose our will globally. It’s all in your best interests, of course.
The agenda is in plain sight - these buggers aren’t even trying to hide it. It’s all framed in terms of health and protection and safety - but it’s the “transformative change” they really want.
Donald Trump made the absolutely correct decision when he abandoned the corrupt WHO. Brain Dead Brandon getting us back in and trying to surrender USA Sovereignty will not play out well.
https://twitter.com/texaslindsay/status/1517727088979193856?s=21&t=th0ALYSzXx2m2HW1d2Nf0A
Good news for the “horribly under vaccinated countries”