Are We Living in a Doctatorship?
The text in the image translates (I think) as “the next vaccination will set you free”. Remember when it was all about flattening curves, or squashing sombreros? Saving the NHS, opening up when the vulnerable have been vaccinated? Remember all those things? Now, in many places, freedoms are being made conditional upon vaccination status - and we’re dangerously close to this in the UK.
These are not your freedoms anymore - they are privileges given to you by your government as a reward for good behaviour.
As an example, have a look at Jacinda Ardern, prime minister of New Zealand, smiling whilst she says, straight up, she’s creating a two-tier society - essentially of the “clean” and “unclean” - although, of course, these are not the terms she uses. She then goes on to say about the vaccine passports
“. . . they’re not just a tool to drive up vaccines, they’re a tool for confidence. People who have been vaccinated will want to know that they’re around other vaccinated people. They’ll want to know they’re in a safe environment”
Let’s unpick this a bit.
The first thing to note is the open admission the passports are a coercive measure. You could argue that a secondary effect here is a health benefit - if you believe the vaccines lead to an overall health benefit. But, in and of themselves, the vaccine passports have no health benefit - they are (allegedly) being used as a tool to bring about a secondary, supposed health benefit.
Here we should be reminded that, from the Pharmaceutical companies own trial data, overall health outcomes were worse in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group. It’s like the dentist who tells his patient “the treatment was successful - it saved your teeth. Unfortunately, it destroyed your gums”.
The second thing to note is how we move on from coercion to confidence. Now we see that she’s subtly putting this on the vaccinated population: we don’t really want to do this but, shucks, you guys will only stop being afraid unless we introduce these measures.
Never mind that people are only afraid because YOU told them to be by subjecting them to the most appalling, relentless and misleading propaganda. Never mind that it makes no sense - if the vaccines work then what, precisely, are they afraid of? Aren’t the vaccinated protected now?
Isn’t it amazing that we have managed to develop a vaccine that only works, provided you never come into contact with an unvaccinated person? Isn’t “science” a wonderful thing?
Of course, this very point has been made more powerfully by others:
The protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected in the first place
Those who seem to believe that by merely attaching the label “vaccine” to some chemical gloop magically infuses it with the properties of safety and effectiveness need to ask themselves why there has never been a vaccine in history for which the advice after vaccination has been “avoid the unvaccinated”.
In other words, we might state this advice as: you know that stuff we gave you to protect you from infection? Well, it’s probably best you don’t go near any sources of infection.
It would be like issuing stab vests to the Police that only work in non-violent situations.
As if the grinning maniac hadn’t said quite enough already, we note a third thing in her short statement. “They’ll want to know they’re in a safe environment”. Think about what this implies. It implies that the unvaccinated constitute an unsafe environment, whereas the vaccinated constitute a safe environment.
In what way is this substantially different than just coming straight out and saying that the unvaccinated are “spreaders of disease”? I recall reading about the fellow in the picture above promoting a similar kind of view when he established a two-tier society. How did that work out?
More worryingly, and I apologise for using scientific jargon here, it’s absolute bollocks that the vaccinated do not spread the disease. Many studies have shown that the infected vaccinated and the infected unvaccinated carry the same viral loads. Some have even shown it to be much higher in the vaccinated. What sort of vaccine is it that doesn’t actually stimulate the mechanisms that kill the virus? If the vaccine doesn’t lead to a reduced viral load then what the hell is it actually doing for us?
We’ve gone from 3 weeks to flatten the curve to 3 jabs to keep your job in what has been a spectacular coup d'état. It isn’t any government that has fallen, however. No, it’s rights and freedoms that have fallen. In many places they’ve been whisked away and made conditional upon being injected with something.
And remember, always remember, that everything we’ve seen, everything that has been done, all of the collateral damage, has been done in response to a virus that is a little bit worse than a severe flu.